Legal Opinion
Vance v. County of Santa Clara
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 11, 1996No. C-92-20275 RPAPublishedCited by 181 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS THE SECOND AND THIRD CAUSES OF ACTION FROM THE PLAINTIFFS’ FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT.
AGUILAR, District Judge.
Defendants County of Santa Clara (“County”), Santa Clara Department of Corrections (“Department”), and individual Defendants Bowling, Conroy, Corley, Cushing, Dixon, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gregory, Grima, Jackson, Ledesma, Lombardo, Rogelstad, Sparacino, and Tiano (“individual Defendants”) bring this Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Vance, Hardy, Lilley, Ismeal’s Fourth Amended Complaint. For the Following reasons the Court DISMISSES with prejudice,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Hafer v. MeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Jett v. Dallas Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Brandon v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by181 opinions
- Luke v. AbbottDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1997
- Nelson v. County of SacramentoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013
- Smith-Berch, Inc. v. Baltimore County, Md.District Court, D. Maryland · 1999
- Hyun Ju Park v. City of HonoluluDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2018
- Garcia v. City of MercedDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2008
176 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.