Legal Opinion
Harrison v. Banque Indosuez
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 20, 1998No. 94 CIV. 6763(PKL)PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LEISURE, District Judge.
Pursuant to Rule 56(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, defendants Banque Indosuez (the “Bank”), Jean-Claude Gruffat (“Gruffat”), and Norbert Graetz (“Graetz”) move for partial summary judgment in the instant matter. For the reasons stated below, defendants’ motions are granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
In October of 1981, Leslie A. Harrison (“Harrison” or plaintiff) joined the Bank as a trader on the Bank’s Money Market Desk. Graetz became her supervisor in September of 1989, and upon Graetz’s recommendation, the Bank promoted…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Carole Tomka v. The Seiler Corporation, Daniel Lucey, David Polonsky and Timothy ConroyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Bass v. World Wrestling Federation Entertainment, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2001
- Coddington v. Adelphi UniversityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999
- Meckenberg v. New York City Off-Track BettingDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Winokur v. Office of Court AdministrationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2002
- Klein v. London Star Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.