Legal Opinion

Keene v. Elkhart County Park & Recreation Board

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 14, 2000No. 20A03-0006-CV-205PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAILEY, Judge

Case Summary

Appellants Samuel and Marilyn Keene (the Keenes), Plaintiffs below, present this interlocutory appeal of the trial court's entry of partial summary judgment in favor of appellee-defendant Elkhart County Park and Recreation Board (the Board). We reverse.

Issue

The issue certified by the trial court for interlocutory appeal pursuant to Indiana Appellate Rule 4(B)(6) is:

When a deed contains the statement: '[Als [al part of the consideration for the sale and purchase of this land, it is agreed that [ ] grantee [ ] will construct and [forever] maintain [a proper]…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wolvos v. MeyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Noblesville Redevelopment Commmission v. Noblesville Associates Ltd. PartnershipIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Midland Railway Co. v. FisherIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Ray v. WoosterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  5. Columbia Club, Inc. v. American Fletcher Realty Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Mayer v. BMR PROPERTIES, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Higgason v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Kopetsky v. CrewsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Parkison v. Richard G.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Allen Gray Ltd. Partnership IV v. MumfordIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API