In re Tice
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Pennsylvania
In Bankruptcy. On exceptions to decision of John M. Wilson, referee, sur petition of Good Roads Machinery Company, for the reclamation of property.
1Opinion of the Court
ARCHBARD, District Judge.
It is admitted that the property in question was delivered to the bankrupt under the following agreement, and that the right of the claimant depends upon the construction to be given thereto.
Howard, Pa., June 1, 1904.
Good Roads Machinery Co.
Kennett Square, Pa.
C. M. Tice,
Oak Grove, Clinton Co., Pa.
Care N. X. C. R. R.
About June 10.
Rent Contract.
1. No. 4 Champion Rock Crusher, one set Mountings and Brake, one 16 ft. Elevator, one Twelve Ton Bin, one 32"x7 ft Revolving Screen. C. M. Tice to pay freight on above machinery and to pay rent for use of same as follows: $200 in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hewit v. Berlin MacHine WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Hervey v. Rhode Island Locomotive WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Ott v. SweatmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Stiles v. SeatonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
- Stephens v. GiffordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re HeckathornDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1906
- In re MorrisDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1907
- In re PooreDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1905
- Liquid Carbonic Co. v. QuickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1910
- In re RinkerDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.