Legal Opinion
In re Poore
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 4, 1905No. 667PublishedCited by 3 opinions
In Bankruptcy. Sur petition of the Cary Safe Company to reclaim certain property.
1Opinion of the Court
ARCHBALD, District Judge.
The petitioners ask for an order on the trustee to turn over a safe delivered by them to the bankrupt upon the following writing:
“Scranton, 7/21 1904.
“Gary Safe Co.
“Buffalo, N. X.
“Please send as soon as convenient, one No. 26 Eire Proof Safe, approximate size inside, 40 inches high, 32 inches wide, 15 inches deep, as per illustrated catalogue, or plan on back hereof, if any, necessary alterations allowed.
Ship via-from Buffalo N. Y., and rent same to undersigned on following terms, E. O. B. my office, notes $125 and my 0[ld] S[afe] as follows: $25 and my O. S. on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ott v. SweatmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Farquhar v. McAlevy, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Huntingdon County1891
- Brunswick & Balke Co. v. HooverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
- Peek v. HeimSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
- Thompson v. Paret & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hinton v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- In re MorrisDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1907
- In re GaglioneDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1912