Liquid Carbonic Co. v. Quick
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. In the matter of Harry Rinker, bankrupt. On appeals from orders of the District Court (174 Fed. 490) by the Liquid Carbonic Company and the National Cash Register Company.
1Opinion of the Court
LANNING, Circuit Judge.
These appeals are from orders dismissing the petitions of appellants for the reclamation of certain articles of personal property in the possession of the bankrupt’s trustee. The articles were delivered to the bankrupt under the terms of certain written contracts, which the appellants insist were bailments for hire, and which the appellees insist were conditional sales. If any of the contracts be a bailment, the property delivered under it should be restored to the appellant whose contract is so construed; if any of them be a condL tional sale, it is conceded! that the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Stiles v. SeatonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
- Farquhar v. McAlevy, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Huntingdon County1891
- Kelley Springfield Road Roller Co. v. SchlimmeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- Rowe v. SharpSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1865
- Enlow v. KleinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ferry & Co. v. ForquerMontana Supreme Court · 1921
- In re HartdagenDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1911
- L. C. Smith & Bro. Typewriter Co. v. AllemanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1912