Noland v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Circuit Judge.
The appellee moves to docket and dismiss the appeal herein upon the ground that the period for the settlement of the bill of exceptions has expired, and that the bill has not yet been settled; and also upon the ground that the assignments of error have not been presented within the time allowed by law.
Appellee relies upon a certificate of the clerk of the District Court setting out the following docket entries: “Sep. 11, 1937, Court ordered defendant have 30 days to file assignment of errors and proposed bill of exceptions; U. S. have 10 days thereafter to file proposed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ray v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Harris v. Moreland Motor Truck Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921
- Reiner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
- United States v. KielingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hartwell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
- Conway v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
- Tudor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944