Legal Opinion

Reiner v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 3, 1937No. 8377PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This case was argued upon the assumption that a motion for a directed verdict was made and denied, and exception noted, at the conclusion of the evidence. The appellant points to a minute order which is not incorporated in the bill of exceptions to support his claims or error in the denial of such a motion.

The motion if made, and the ruling of the court thereon, and exception, should be incorporated in the bill of exceptions. U. S. v. Payne (C.C.A.) 72 F.(2d) 593, citing Chicago Great Western Ry. v. Le Valley (C.C.A.) 233 F. 384, 387; Felder v. Reeth (C.C.A.) 62 F.(2d) 730. In view of our…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ray v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Chicago Great Western R. v. ValleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
  3. United States v. PayneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
  4. Felder v. ReethCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Conway v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
  2. Tudor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
  3. Denver-Greeley Valley Irr. Dist. v. McNeilCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  4. Noland v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API