Legal Opinion

United States v. Kieling

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 13, 1933No. 7237PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

This is an action to recover on a war risk insurance policy on the ground that the plaintiff became totally and permanently disabled during the life of his policy. The sole question sought to bo presented on this appeal is whether or not the court erred in not granting the defendant’s motion for directed verdict.

It appears that on September 28, 1918, the plaintiff was injured in battle in the Argonne Forest. He testified as to the circumstances of his injury and his physical condition thereafter and the treatment he received. He was admitted to the field hospital October…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
  2. Harris v. Moreland Motor Truck Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921
  3. Board of County Com'rs of Osage County v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1933
  4. Willamette & Columbia River Towing Co. v. HutchisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Robertson v. Morganton Full Fashioned Hosiery Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
  2. Joplin Ice Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
  3. Noland v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API