Legal Opinion

Betancourt v. Federated Department Stores

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided August 10, 2010No. 2:09-mj-00856PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

XAVIER RODRIGUEZ, District Judge.

On this date, the Court considered Defendant Macy’s West Stores, Inc.’s 1 Motion to Dismiss (docket no. 8), and the Response thereto.

I. Background

Plaintiff Guadalupe Betancourt, a Kansas resident, filed her original complaint against Defendant Federated Department Stores on October 20, 2009, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief, attorney’s fees, litigation expenses, and costs under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). Plaintiff is mobility impaired and uses a wheelchair. She alleges that she visited the Macy’s store (“the…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Macy's, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Gilkerson v. Chasewood BankDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2014
  3. Scherr v. Marriot International, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
  4. Mabary v. Hometown Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2012
  5. Castillo v. Hank Sully LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2023

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API