Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Albert

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided August 27, 1990No. 63,463; NMCM 88-4935PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

EVERETT, Chief Judge:

Appellant entered into a pretrial agreement whereunder he agreed to plead guilty to two charges and the convening authority obligated himself to suspend any confinement in excess of 2 years and “all forfeitures in excess of $250 pay per month for ... 1 year.” At the time of this agreement, appellant was serving on active duty *332pursuant to an involuntary extension of his obligated service.

At trial, appellant entered the guilty pleas as agreed and was convicted pursuant thereto. The sentence adjudged was a bad-conduct discharge, 18 months’ confinement,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. BedaniaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  3. United States v. OlsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  4. United States v. ChurnovicUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  5. United States v. CleckleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
  2. United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
  3. United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  4. United States v. HardcastleCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  5. United States v. LingenfelterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API