Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Hardcastle

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided August 18, 2000No. 99-0632/MCPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge SULLIVAN

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Appellant was tried by a general court-martial composed of a military judge sitting alone at Camp Pendleton, California. Pursuant to his pleas, he was found guilty of distributing and using methamphetamine, in violation of Article 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 912a. On June 3, 1997, he was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 30 months, total forfeitures, and reduction to pay grade E-l. On October 17, 1997, the convening authority, in accordance with a pretrial agreement, approved this sentence but deferred…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. BedaniaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  3. United States v. OlsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  4. Halas v. Department of EnergySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. United States v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. United States v. PerronCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
  2. United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
  3. United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
  4. United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  5. United States v. PerronU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API