Legal Opinion

United States v. Hopwood

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided May 17, 1990No. 63,076; ACM 27437PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

EVERETT, Chief Judge:

I

Appellant was tried by a general court-martial at Reese Air Force Base, Texas, on August 23-25, 1988. Contrary to his pleas, he was found guilty of making two false official statements1 and committing four forgeries, in violation of Articles 107 and 123, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 907 and 923, respectively. All four forgeries were alleged to have occurred on or about January 18, 1988; and all concerned the same transaction — the purchase of a 1988 Nissan Maxima automobile. The four forgery specifications related respectively to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. StrandUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  2. United States v. FarleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
  3. United States v. ThomasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  4. United States v. PhillipsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
  5. United States v. HopwoodU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. BurnetteUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  2. United States v. BellU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
  3. United States v. IveyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991
  4. United States v. BanfieldUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  5. United States v. WhiteUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API