Legal Opinion

United States v. Thomas

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided February 22, 1988No. 53,089; SPCM 20510PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

EVERETT, Chief Judge:

A military judge sitting as a special court-martial convicted appellant, contrary to his pleas, of uttering a forged document, in violation of Article 123, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 923.1 2 3He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge and reduction to Private E-l. The convening authority approved the findings and sentence, and the Court of Military Review affirmed in a short-form opinion.

We granted review of this issue:

WHETHER THE DOCUMENT (COMMANDING OFFICER’S LETTER) WHICH WAS THE SUBJECT OF THE ADDITIONAL CHARGE (UTTERING A…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. StrandUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  2. United States v. FarleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
  3. United States v. Kathleen C. WegerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  4. United States v. AddyeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  5. Head v. HunterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States v. WalkerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989
  2. United States v. BurnetteUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  3. United States v. HopwoodUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  4. United States v. BellU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
  5. United States v. IveyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API