Legal Opinion

In Re Yim

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1999No. 67183-4, 67214-8PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

989 P.2d 512 (1999)

139 Wash.2d 581

In re the Personal Restraints of Andrew YIM and Deng Samphao, Petitioners.

State of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Donald Maynard Yokley and Penny Gay Yokley, Petitioners.

Nos. 67183-4, 67214-8.

Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc.

Argued May 20, 1999.

Decided December 2, 1999.

Frederick O. Frohmader, Tacoma, Allen, Hansen & Maybrown, Todd Maybrown, Seattle, Charles Williams, Silverdale, for Petitioners.

Norm Maleng, King County Prosecutor, Charles W. Lind, James Whisman, Deputies, King County Prosecutor, Seattle, for Respondent.

ALEXANDER, J.

Andrew Yim and Deng Samphao…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. In Re the Personal Restraint of CookWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Waste Management of Seattle, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1994

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. State v. GoreWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. MaddoxWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. ChenowethWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. MaddoxWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Hallauer v. Spectrum Properties, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2001

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API