Legal Opinion

Jueschke v. Seeley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 18, 1924No. 13527PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error from District Court, Garfield County ; James B. Cullison, Judge. Action by John Neal Seeley, a minor, against Charles Jueschke. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JONES, C.

This suit was instituted in the district court of Garfield county, by plaintiff, a minor, by his mother as next friend, to recover $25,000 damages for injuries received in a collision which occurred in the city of Enid, between a motorcycle upon which plaintiff was a 'passenger, and an automobile belonging to the defendant, driven by Ivan Tinker, an employe of the defendant. The injury complained of ultimately resulted in, and necessitated the amputation of a lower limb of plaintiff, and there is no controversy as to the injury and the extent thereof.

The case was submitted…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. LamarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  2. Town of Sentinel v. RileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. BellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Oklahoma City v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. Padgett v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API