Legal Opinion

Town of Sentinel v. Riley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 16, 1935No. 25187PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant in error, as plaintiff, brought this action against the plaintiff in error, as defendant, in the district court of Washita county, to recover judgment for damages arising out of the de-' fondant’s septic tank or disposal plant, and thereafter recovered judgment for $1,100 damages, from which judgment the defendant appeals. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court, plaintiff and defendant.

The plaintiff in his petition against defendant filed April 29, 1932, alleged in substance that he owned a tract of about 24 acres of land contiguous to the town of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Evanston v. GunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Cliquot's ChampagneSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  3. Northup v. EakesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. William T. Galt and Others v. James Galloway, Jun. And OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  5. Walters v. Prairie Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Key Et Ux. v. British American Oil Producing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  2. Noble v. City of BethanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  3. State ex rel. Pollution Control Coordinating Board v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  4. Rodgers v. Oklahoma Wheat Pool Terminal Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. Lyday v. HollowaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API