Washoe County v. Otto
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*426OPINION
By the Court,
Hardesty, J.:
In this appeal, we examine the Nevada Administrative Procedure Act (APA) requirement that a petitioner name, as respondents to a petition for judicial review of an administrative decision, “all parties of record.” NRS 233B.130(2)(a). Because the APA grants the district court special statutory jurisdiction to review an administrative decision, we conclude that a party must strictly comply with the APA naming requirement as a prerequisite to invoking the district court’s jurisdiction. Thus, when a petitioner fails to name in its petition each party of record to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ultsch v. Illinois Municipal Retirement FundIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
- Ogawa v. OgawaNevada Supreme Court · 2009
- Harris Associates v. Clark County School DistrictNevada Supreme Court · 2003
- Pasillas v. HSBC BANK USANevada Supreme Court · 2011
- Wren v. Texas Employment Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Adelson v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Vanguard Piping Systems, Inc. v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada Ex Rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2013
- Philip R. v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of StateNevada Supreme Court · 2018
- Prevost v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2018
- County of Clark v. Howard Hughes Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 2013
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.