Legal Opinion
Harris Associates v. Clark County School District
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided December 30, 2003No. 38140PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Clark County School District (CCSD) contracted with appellant Harris Associates for construction work. When disputes arose between the parties, Harris requested that those disputes be submitted to arbitration. The CCSD rejected Harris’s request, and Harris filed an action to compel arbitration, arguing that NRS 338.150(1) 1 mandates that the parties arbitrate their disputes. The district court denied Harris’s motion to compel arbitration, and Harris appeals. We reverse the district court’s order.
FACTS
In 1998, the CCSD, a political subdivision of the State of Nevada, contracted with…
3Cases cited17 opinions
- McKay v. Board of Sup'rs of Carson CityNevada Supreme Court · 1986
- Banegas Ex Rel. Banegas v. State Industrial Insurance SystemNevada Supreme Court · 2001
- Garvin v. Ninth Judicial District Court of the State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 2002
- Clark County School District v. Local Government Employee-Management Relations BoardNevada Supreme Court · 1974
- Coast Hotels & Casinos, Inc. v. Nevada State Labor CommissionNevada Supreme Court · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by58 opinions
- International Game Technology, Inc. v. Second Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- D.R. Horton, Inc. v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2007
- SFR Invs. Pool 1, LLC v. Bank of N.Y. MellonNevada Supreme Court · 2018
- Leven v. FreyNevada Supreme Court · 2007
- Washoe Medical Center v. Second Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of WashoeNevada Supreme Court · 2006
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.