Legal Opinion

Prevost v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 2018No. 71472PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, PARRAGUIRRE, J.:

This is an appeal from an order dismissing a petition for judicial review under NRS 233B.130(2). In particular, NRS 233B.130(2)(a) provides that a petition for judicial review must "[n]ame as respondents the agency and all parties of record to the administrative proceeding." In this appeal, we are asked to determine whether the failure to name a party of record in the caption of a petition for judicial review is jurisdictionally fatal under NRS 233B.130(2)(a) where the party is named in the body of the petition and is properly served with the petition. We…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Washoe County v. OttoNevada Supreme Court · 2012

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. WHITFIELD VS. NEV. STATE PERS. COMM'NNevada Supreme Court · 2021
  2. STATE, DEP'T OF CORR. VS. DEROSANevada Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Stevens Vs. Assoc. Risk Mgmt., Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Sun City Summerlin Cmty. Ass'N, Inc. Vs. Clark Cty. C/W 76791Nevada Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Sun City Summerlin Cmty. Ass'N, Inc. Vs. Clark Cty. C/W 76791Nevada Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API