Ultsch v. Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Freeman
Chief Justice Thomas and Justices Fitzgerald, Gar-man, and Burke concurred in the judgment and opinion.
Justice Kilbride dissented, with opinion, joined by Justice Karmeier.
OPINION
In the circuit court of Lake County, plaintiff, Sharee Ultsch, sought to amend her complaint for administrative review to add the Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund Board of Trustees as a defendant, relying on section 3 — 103 of the Administrative Review Law (735 ILCS 5/3 — 103(2) (West 2004)), as amended by Public Act 89— 685 (eff. June 1, 1997). The circuit court dismissed plaintiffs complaint based on its ruling…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Rescue Army v. Municipal Court of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Advincula v. United Blood ServicesIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
- Bonaguro v. the County Officers Electoral BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
- Castaneda v. Illinois Human Rights CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
- In re E.H., a MinorIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by115 opinions
- Rivera v. Google Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
- Shriners Hospitals for Children v. BaumanIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
- Rosewood Care Center, Inc. v. Caterpillar, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2007
- In re Haley D.Illinois Supreme Court · 2011
- LaSalle Bank, N.A. v. C/HCA Development Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2008
110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.