Samuel Eric Austin v. Cal A. Terhune, Director, and James Williams, Correctional Officer
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CANBY, Circuit Judge.
Samuel Eric Austin, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment dismissing his claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law. His claims arise from an incident in which a correctional officer allegedly exposed his genitalia to Austin and then filed a false disciplinary report against Austin when Austin complained to prison officials. We reverse and remand for further proceedings with respect to Austin’s retaliation claim. We affirm the judgment of the district court in all other respects.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
At the time of the events in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Elmer PRATT, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James K. ROWLAND; James Gomez, Director; Daniel Vasquez; Robert Borg, Et Al., Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Douglas W. Schwenk v. James Hartford Steve Sinclair Robert Mitchell,opinionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by205 opinions
- Alvarez v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- McCollum v. California Department of Corrections & RehabilitationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Norsworthy v. BeardDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Natia Sampson v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Lamont Shepard v. T. QuillenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
200 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.