Legal Opinion

Alvarez v. Hill

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 13, 2008No. 06-35068PublishedCited by 309 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FISHER, Circuit Judge:

We revisit in this appeal the longstanding principle that federal complaints plead claims, not causes of action or statutes or legal theories. Blackie Alvarez (“Alvarez”) brought suit alleging that prison officials substantially burdened his religious exercise by denying him various accommodations. Those officials (“appellees”) now insist that Alvarez’s failure to specifically plead in his complaint a violation of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 (“RLUIPA”), see 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc-l, bars his argument that the district court erred in not…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by309 opinions

  1. Ortiz v. DowneyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  2. Dennis Walker v. BeardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. Blackie Alvarez v. Jean HillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. Jensen v. Quality Loan Service Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2010
  5. Davis v. PowellDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2012

304 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API