Legal Opinion
Elmer PRATT, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James K. ROWLAND; James Gomez, Director; Daniel Vasquez; Robert Borg, Et Al., Defendants-Appellants
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 18, 1995No. 94-16370PublishedCited by 959 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge:
Various officials of the California Department of Corrections (“DOC”) appeal the district court’s grant of a preliminary injunction against them. The district court found that Pratt, a state prisoner, had demonstrated a likelihood of success on his claim that prison officials had transferred him from one facility to another and had placed him in a double cell in retaliation for Pratt’s exercise of protected First Amendment rights. We have jurisdiction over this interlocutory appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1). Because we find that the district…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by959 opinions
- Raymond Watison v. Mary CarterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Rhodes v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Michael Malik Allah v. Thomas SeiverlingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Brodheim v. CryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Allah v. SeiverlingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
954 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.