Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. Arkwright-Boston Manufacturing Mutual Insurance
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SAM H. BELL, District Judge.
Presently before the court in the above-captioned cause is a motion in limine by plaintiff, The Babcock & Wilcox Company (B & W), for a determination of which state law, in the absence of a choice of law by the parties, is to be applied in construing a disputed term of B & W’s liability insurance contract with defendant insurers. Plaintiff contends that, under the “more significant relationship” analysis adopted by Ohio courts, Ohio law should be applied. Defendants have filed a brief in opposition in which they contend that, under the same analysis, Louisiana…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Above Belt, Inc. v. Mel Bohannan Roofing, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1983
- Grantham and Mann, Inc., D/B/A Grantham Safety Industries, Inc. v. American Safety Products, Inc., Sam Evans, Richard J. Althoff and James HunnekeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Gries Sports Enterprises, Inc. v. ModellOhio Supreme Court · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ohayon v. Safeco InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- International Surplus Lines Insurance v. Certain Underwriters & Underwriting Syndicates at Lloyd's of LondonDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1994
- Ohayon v. Safeco Ins. Co. of IllinoisOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- North River Insurance v. Employers Reinsurance Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2002