Legal Opinion

Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. Arkwright-Boston Manufacturing Mutual Insurance

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided August 3, 1992No. 1:91-mc-00987PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

SAM H. BELL, District Judge.

Presently before the court in the above-captioned cause is a motion in limine by plaintiff, The Babcock & Wilcox Company (B & W), for a determination of which state law, in the absence of a choice of law by the parties, is to be applied in construing a disputed term of B & W’s liability insurance contract with defendant insurers. Plaintiff contends that, under the “more significant relationship” analysis adopted by Ohio courts, Ohio law should be applied. Defendants have filed a brief in opposition in which they contend that, under the same analysis, Louisiana…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Above Belt, Inc. v. Mel Bohannan Roofing, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1983
  4. Grantham and Mann, Inc., D/B/A Grantham Safety Industries, Inc. v. American Safety Products, Inc., Sam Evans, Richard J. Althoff and James HunnekeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  5. Gries Sports Enterprises, Inc. v. ModellOhio Supreme Court · 1984

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ohayon v. Safeco InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. International Surplus Lines Insurance v. Certain Underwriters & Underwriting Syndicates at Lloyd's of LondonDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1994
  3. Ohayon v. Safeco Ins. Co. of IllinoisOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. North River Insurance v. Employers Reinsurance Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API