Legal Opinion

Bates v. Bowles White & Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1960No. 35083PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, C. J.

— The fundamental question to be resolved is whether the record presents a “genuine issue as to any material fact.” If it does, the case must be submitted to a jury for determination. Defendant appeals from a summary judgment entered by the court, “a jury panel having been called and waiting in attendance.”

The pleadings, depositions, affidavits, and exhibits present these facts:

March 20, 1957, plaintiff Mathel Bates purchased a tuna fishing boat, the D.V. “Flo,” for $10,500; the bill of sale vested title in her. Plaintiff later paid a promissory note secured by the preferred ship’s mortgage…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Preston v. DuncanWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Gardner v. SeymourWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Buyken v. ErtnerWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Kay v. Occidental Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Mayflower Air-Conditioners, Inc. v. West Coast Heating Supply, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. LaPlante v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Amend v. BellWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Sepich v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Havas v. CarterNevada Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Hughes v. Chehalis School District No. 302Washington Supreme Court · 1963

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API