Legal Opinion
Virgenia M. Ryan v. Potlatch Corporation and Self-Insured/Comp Cost, Inc., Relators.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 13, 2016No. A15-1404PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIETZEN, Justice.
After suffering a back injury that arose out of and in the course of her employment with relator Potlatch Corporation, respondent Virgenia M. Ryan entered into a “full, final and complete settlement” of her claims for workers’ compensation benefits related to’ that injury. Later, Ryan filed a claim petition alleging that she sustained a back injury with consequential,depression and anxiety. Potlatch moved to dismiss this petition on the ground that Ryan was required under Minn.Stat. § 176.461 (2014) to first bring a,. motion to set aside her settlement agreement with…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gillette v. Harold, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Schatz v. Interfaith Care CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- U.S. Bank N. A. v. Cold Spring Granite Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- West Bend Mutual Insurance Co. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- Turner v. Federal Reserve Bank of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hudson v. Trillium StaffingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- Noga v. Minn. Vikings Football ClubSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019