Legal Opinion
Lunsford v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided June 25, 2007No. 57293-8-IPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
160 P.3d 1089 (2007)
Ronald LUNSFORD and Esther Lunsford, Appellants,
v.
SABERHAGEN HOLDINGS, INC., First Doe through One Hundredth Doe, Respondents.
No. 57293-8-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
June 25, 2007.
Zachary B. Herschensohn, James E. Shadduck, Attorney at Law, Portland, OR, for Appellants.
Timothy Kost Thorson, Neal J. Philip, Carney Badley Smith & Spellman, Seattle, WA, for Respondents.
William Joel Rutzick, Schroeter Goldmark & Bender, Janet L. Rice, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Amicus Curiae on behalf of Goldmark & Bender Schroeter.
APPELWICK, C.J.
¶ 1 At issue is whether…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
- Robinson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1992
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Lunsford v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2009
- Lunsford v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. LazcanoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Hurley v. Port Blakely Tree Farms LPCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Bankston v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.