Legal Opinion

Bankston v. Pierce County

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 21, 2013No. 42850-4-IIPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorswick, C.J.

¶1 — A sole proprietorship is not a legal entity separate from its owner. In this contract dispute, Richard Bankston d/b/a Aarohn Construction appeals summary judgment dismissing his suit against Pierce County. He argues that an entity named Aarohn Construction submitted a successful bid and entered into a contract with the County. Holding that any contract between Richard Bankston d/b/a Aarohn Construction and the County is illegal, we affirm.

FACTS

¶2 The County solicited bids to perform a small public works project involving tree replacement. John Bankston, a sole proprietor doing business…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Clements v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Owen v. Burlington Northern and Santa Fe RR Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Owen v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Golberg v. SanglierWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Department of Labor & Industries v. FankhauserWashington Supreme Court · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. U.S. Tr. v. Ellis (In re Ellis)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · 2018
  2. Alexandria Real Equities Inc. John J. Cox, Dean A. Takko, V. University Of WaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2023
  3. Alexandria Real Equities Inc. John J. Cox, Dean A. Takko, V. University Of WaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2023
  4. Bungie Inc v. Aimjunkies.comDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
  5. Chris Jones And Katrina Jones, V. Dept. Of L&iCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API