Bankston v. Pierce County
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtWorswick, C.J.
¶1 — A sole proprietorship is not a legal entity separate from its owner. In this contract dispute, Richard Bankston d/b/a Aarohn Construction appeals summary judgment dismissing his suit against Pierce County. He argues that an entity named Aarohn Construction submitted a successful bid and entered into a contract with the County. Holding that any contract between Richard Bankston d/b/a Aarohn Construction and the County is illegal, we affirm.
FACTS
¶2 The County solicited bids to perform a small public works project involving tree replacement. John Bankston, a sole proprietor doing business…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Clements v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
- Owen v. Burlington Northern and Santa Fe RR Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
- Owen v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Golberg v. SanglierWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Department of Labor & Industries v. FankhauserWashington Supreme Court · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- U.S. Tr. v. Ellis (In re Ellis)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · 2018
- Alexandria Real Equities Inc. John J. Cox, Dean A. Takko, V. University Of WaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2023
- Alexandria Real Equities Inc. John J. Cox, Dean A. Takko, V. University Of WaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2023
- Bungie Inc v. Aimjunkies.comDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
- Chris Jones And Katrina Jones, V. Dept. Of L&iCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.