Legal Opinion

National Surety Co. v. W. H. Holliday Co.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1931No. 1679PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kimball, Chief Justice.

This case was first brought to this court by appeal, and the appeal dismissed. 42 Wyo. 61, 289 Pac. 1094. The defendant in error, as plaintiff below, obtained judgment against the plaintiff in error and F. A. Bundy for a sum alleged to be due for materials furnished in the execution of a contract between defendant Bundy and the State Highway Commission for the construction of a federal aid highway project. The plaintiff in error is the surety on the bond given by Bundy to guarantee the performance of the contract. The sole question is whether the petition is sufficient…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. French v. PowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Hahn v. Citizens State BankWyoming Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Waterbury Lumber & Coal Co. v. CooganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1901
  4. Hotel Co. v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. W.H. Holliday v. BundyWyoming Supreme Court · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kirkpatrick v. DouglasMontana Supreme Court · 1937
  2. National Surety Co. v. SangrenWyoming Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API