People v. Huson
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, c. c.
This is an action to recover the sum of $1,045.10, money alleged to have been received in an official capacity and misappropriated by defendant Huson, and is based upon what is called his official bond.
*155It is alleged in the complaint that Huson was appointed to the position of wharfinger by the board of state harbor commissioners on the thirtieth day of August, 1877, and that he entered upon the duties of his office on the first day of September, 1877, and continued in the office until the thirtieth day of December following; that the duties of a wharfinger were to collect and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Hubert v. MendheimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Mendocino County v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Placer County v. DickersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- People v. JenkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
3Cited by12 opinions
- Fernelius v. PierceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- California Development Co. v. New Liverpool Salt Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1909
- County of Sonoma v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Sokoloff v. Fidelity Cas. Co. of N. Y.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Brockway v. PettedMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.