Legal Opinion

Young v. Waldrop

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1941No. 8,149PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Johnson

Plaintiffs Young and Olson were the sureties on the appeal undertaking and stay bond of the appellants Maser in the case of Waldrop v. Maser, 93 Mont. 612, 23 Pac. (2d) 417. That appeal was dismissed by this court for appellants’ failure to file the transcript within the time provided by statute and court rule, and the trial court on the motion of Waldrop, the plaintiff and respondent in that case, thereupon entered summary judgment in his favor against the sureties as provided by section 9735, Revised Codes, and the undertaking.

The sureties thereupon attempted to appeal from the summary…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. French v. PowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Guerney v. MooreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  3. Davies v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Young v. OrpheusMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  5. Levert v. ReadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Southall v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
  2. McCarten v. SandersonMontana Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Phipps v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Hulegaard v. GarrettOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Development Bank v. TuikaHigh Court of American Samoa · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API