Specialties Development Corp. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, District Judge.
This is a civil action in which the plaintiff seeks to compel the defendant to account for royalties alleged to be due for the years 1946 to 1949, inclusive, under a certain license agreement. The defendant admits that the royalties were not paid but defends the action on the ground that the agreement was breached by the plaintiff. The questions here raised are primarily questions of law; there is some conflict in the testimony but there is no serious dispute as to the material facts.
Facts
I
The original agreement upon which this-action is predicated was one between Walter…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Rosenthal Paper Co. v. National Folding Box & Paper Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Mayer v. RocheSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
- Wilfley v. New Standard Concentrator Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908
- Hinkly v. FreickSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- New Wrinkle, Inc. v. John L. Armitage & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
- Specialties Development Corp. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- Invengineering, Inc. v. Foregger Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1960
- Research Frontiers Inc. v. Marks Polarized Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1969
- BAYMONT FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC. v. THE BERNSTEIN COMPANY, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023