Legal Opinion
Mayer v. Roche
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided November 15, 1909PublishedCited by 23 opinions
On error to the Supreme Court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Swayze, J.
This is an action on a promissory note. The plaintiff in error appears to he a joint maker. The facts were agreed on, and the case tried before the court without a jury.
It was admitted that the note was signed by Mrs. Roche in this state, where she resided, that she received nothing thereon, and was either an accommodation guarantor or surety for the other makers. The note is dated and payable in New York, but it does not appear whether it was delivered in that state *682or in New Jersey. The case, therefore, differs from Thompson v. Taylor, 37…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wayman v. SouthardSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
- Pritchard v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Andrews v. PondSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Shoe & Leather National Bank v. WoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
- Lewis v. LewisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1901
3Cited by23 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Estate of SimmonsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Clark v. State Street Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Poole v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919
- Wilfred MacDonald v. CushmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
- Air Economy Corp. v. Aero-Flow DynamicsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.