Rosenthal Paper Co. v. National Folding Box & Paper Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal, by permission, from a judgment entered January 8, 1917, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, which reversed a determination of the Appellate Term, reversing a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York in favor, of defendant, entered upon an order setting aside a verdict in favor of plaintiff and dismissing the complaint. The Appellate Term directed reinstatement of the verdict.
Read the full summary
Appeal, by permission, from a judgment entered January 8, 1917, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, which reversed a determination of the Appellate Term, reversing a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York in favor, of defendant, entered upon an order setting aside a verdict in favor of plaintiff and dismissing the complaint. The Appellate Term directed reinstatement of the verdict. The Appellate Division affirmed the City Court judgment. The nature of the action and the facts, so far as material, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtCollin, J.
The action was for the recovery of royalties for the use of a patent. Originally brought in the City Court of New York city, the jury rendered a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $1,840.73. The judgment of the City Court set the verdict aside, upon the ground that it was contrary to law, and dismissed the complaint. The Appellate Term, upon the appeal of the plaintiff, reversed that judgment, reinstated the verdict and upon it rendered judgment for the plaintiff. The Appellate Division, upon the appeal of the defendant, reversed the determination of the Appellate Term and affirmed the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Howard v. . DalyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Central Trust Co. of Ill. v. Chicago Auditorium Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Littlefield v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. RichardsIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Jacob & Youngs, Inc. v. KentNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Blish v. Thompson Automatic Arms Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1948
- Allhusen v. Caristo Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Novick v. AXA NETWORK, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Bear, Stearns Funding, Inc. v. Interface Group-Nevada, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.