Legal Opinion
Haddock v. First National Bank and Trust Company
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 13, 1956No. 37214PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARLILE, Justice.
This action was brought by Leonard Raymond Haddock as plaintiff to recover from the defendant, First National Bank and Trust Company of Tulsa, Oklahoma, the amount of $968 paid to said defendant. The amended petition alleges:
“1. That the plaintiff is now and has been at all times hereinafter mentioned a resident of Tulsa County, Oklahoma, and the defendant at all times hereinafter mentioned is a national bank duly authorized to do business and doing business in the City of Tulsa, Tulsa County, Oklahoma.
“II. That on or about the 12th day of December, 1952, this plaintiff filed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Morgan v. Stanton Auto Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Fiegel v. First Nat. Bank of KingfisherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Schuman Bros. v. First Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Allen v. BantaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ingram v. LIBERTY NATL. BANK & TRUST CO. OF OKLAHOMA CITYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Watson v. EstleCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998