Legal Opinion

Spicer v. Beaman Bottling Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1996PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, Justice.

In this appeal, we are asked to determine whether the plaintiffs action under the Tennessee Human Rights Act was timely filed within the one-year statute of limitations. The trial court held that a hostile environment existed which did not end until plaintiffs termination, and that therefore her claim of sexual harassment was not barred. The Court of Appeals reversed, holding that no act of sexual harassment occurred within the one-year period, and that the alleged retaliatory actions did not extend the statute under the continuing violation exception to the statute…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Bazemore v. FridaySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Campbell v. Florida Steel Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Tom PIERCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and Capital Holding Corporation, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  5. Dr. Julia Elizabeth Berry v. The Board of Supervisors of L.S.U., Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Cuddyer v. Stop & Shop Supermarket Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  2. Weber v. MosesTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Carr v. United Parcel ServiceTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Booker v. the Boeing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Dennis v. White Way Cleaners, L.P.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API