Tillotson Manufacturing Co. v. Textron, Inc., Homelite
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WEICK, Chief Judge.
These appeals arise out of patent infringement actions between the same parties, involving two patents for improvements of diaphragm type carburetors of different design and construction. They were argued together.
The District Court referred both actions to a Special Master who heard the evidence, considered them separately, wrote opinions and made findings of fact and conclusions of law in each case. These findings of fact and conclusions of law were approved and confirmed by the District Court.
In Appeal No. 15,439, the District Court held that Claims 1 and 2 of Phillips…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Schriber-Schroth Co. v. Cleveland Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Minerals Separation, Ltd. v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Special Equipment Co. v. CoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Edward Valves, Inc., and Rockwell Manufacturing Company v. Cameron Iron Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kaiser Industries Corp. v. McLouth Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- King-Seeley Thermos Co. v. Millersville Manufacturing Co.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1968
- American Infra-Red Radiant Co. v. Lambert Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1965
- The Tillotson Manufacturing Company v. Textron, Inc., Homelite, a Division of Textron, Inc., the Tillotson Manufacturing Company v. Textron, Inc., Homelite, a Division of Textron, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
- Kaiser Industries Corporation v. Mclouth Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968