Legal Opinion

Guse v. Wessels

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1937No. 29985PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

In this case the appellant brought suit against the appellees to recover benefits alleged to. be due under the workmen’s compensation act for injuries sustained while *42in their employ. The trial court found against the appellant and dismissed the action-. From this judgment, appellant appeals.

The record discloses that appellant was employed by the appellees, George W. and Albert Wessels, as a carpenter to assist in building a machine shed on the farm owned by appellees. It was agreed that appellant was to receive 40 cents an hour for his work. It appears that, when the shed was almost…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Peterson v. Farmers State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  2. Sherlock v. SherlockNebraska Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Keefover v. VaseyNebraska Supreme Court · 1924
  4. State ex rel. Foss v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hiestand v. RistauNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Oliver v. ErnstNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Campos v. TomoiNebraska Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Bob White Packing Co. v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1960
  5. Equitable Life Insurance v. Iowa Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API