Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Foss v. Nelson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 6, 1920No. Nos. 21,701, 21,702PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Upon the relation of Walter Foss and his wife the supreme court granted its writ of certiorari directed to the Honorable L. S. Nelson, judge of the Thirteenth judicial district, to review proceedings in that court brought under the Workmen’s Compensation Act by George Tadens, employee, against relators, employers.

1Opinion of the CourtHallam, J.

Eelators Walter Foss and Anna Foss are husband and wife. Anna Foss owned a farm of 160 acres in 'Cottonwood county. Walter Foss looked after it. It was rented to a relative on shares. The Fosses and the tenant farmed it together to some extent. The Fosses fuinished a team and machinery. Walter Foss helped the tenant. He helped around whatever work was necessary, made some improvements, did some tiling, made small repairs, and in 1919 he and the renter tore down an old barn and worked the old lumber into a new one which was built for farm use. Walter Foss transacted the business in connection…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Uphoff v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  2. State ex rel. Lennon v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  3. Maryland Casualty Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Blood v. Industrial Accident Commission of State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  5. State ex rel. Lundgren v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Peterson v. Farmers State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  2. Irvine Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Klein v. McClearySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  4. Greischar v. St. Mary's CollegeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  5. Gahr v. StroutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API