Legal Opinion

State v. Leopardi

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 24, 1997PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

BAIME, J.A.D.

The principal question presented in this case is whether defendant’s right to counsel was violated by the admission at trial of an incriminating note given by him to an inmate law librarian. Although the inmate agreed to deliver the note to defendant’s codefendant who was housed in a different section of the jail, he instead surrendered it to the county prosecutor. We hold that the State did not deliberately extract the incriminating information in the absence of counsel, and the statement was thus properly admitted.

*74I.

A jury found…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Michigan v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Maine v. MoultonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. TimmendequasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  2. State v. BaluchNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
  3. State of Iowa v. Justin Alexander MarshallSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  4. Amended September 20, 2016 State of Iowa v. Justin Alexander MarshallSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  5. JOSEPH MILUTIN VS. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARMENT OF CORRECTIONS (L-3118-06 AND L-3119-06, MERCER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API