Legal Opinion

State of Iowa v. Justin Alexander Marshall

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 30, 2016No. 13–0739PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

APPEL, Justice.

In this case, we consider whether the State violated Justin Marshall’s right to counsel through the acquisition of evidence from jailhouse informants. The district court rejected the claim, and a jury convicted Marshall of first-degree murder. The court of appeals reversed, holding the State had violated Marshall’s Sixth Amendment right to counsel by using a jailhouse informant to obtain incriminating information when Marshall was represented by counsel. Finding the error was not harmless, the court of appeals reversed Marshall’s conviction.

In light of the remand, the court of…

2Cases cited75 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Wesbrook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. AshbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2020
  2. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2020
  3. State v. C. HardyMontana Supreme Court · 2023
  4. State v. Richard Michael ArringtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Commonwealth v. Crispell, D., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API