Legal Opinion

Spring v. Moncrieff

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1958PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.

In this action, the plaintiff sought judgment for brokerage services alleged to have been rendered by bim in connection with a proposed acquisition by Penn-Texas Corporation of the capital stock and assets of the defendant Swan-Finch Oil Corporation, which, it was claimed, failed of consummation because the defendant Moncrieff, who owned a *732substantial amount of the outstanding stock of Swan-Finch, sold his stock to a third party. I have had occasion heretofore to analyze the nature of the causes of action in this matter (208 Misc. 671), and it would be pointless to do so here. The action came…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Greyhound Corp. v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  2. Spring v. MoncrieffNew York Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Moskowitz v. FeuerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  4. Moskowitz v. FeuerNew York Court of Appeals · 1943

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,813 Daniel E. Heffernan v. Pacific Dunlop Gnb Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, and Gnb Incorporated, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  2. University Savings Ass'n v. BurnapCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  3. Booth Oil Site Administrative Group v. Safety-Kleen Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 2000
  4. Continental Copper & Steel Industries, Inc. v. JohnsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980
  5. Dankoff v. Bowling Proprietors Ass'n of America, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API