Moskowitz v. Feuer
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In the light of the admitted sale of the mill, apparently, although not expressly stated, to Continental Grain Company, there does not seem to have been even a showing of breach of contract. The inference created is that the sale terminated the lease of the mill by Continental Grain Company and, thereupon, the employment contracts, based upon that lease, were also terminated. In any event, on the facts as alleged, as distinguished from sheer conclusions, no cause of action is set forth to hold liable the defendant for the breach by Continental Grain Company, of which he was an officer and a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Greyhound Corp. v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- Hicks v. HaightNew York Supreme Court · 1939
- Lukach v. BlairNew York Supreme Court · 1919
- Lukach v. ReigartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
3Cited by7 opinions
- A. S. Rampell, Inc. v. Hyster Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Terry v. ZachryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
- Bereswill v. YablonNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Spring v. MoncrieffNew York Supreme Court · 1958
- Nathanson v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.