Legal Opinion
Dankoff v. Bowling Proprietors Ass'n of America, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 27, 1972PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCharles R. Rubin, J.
This action was originally one for a declaratory judgment that the defendant was required to defend the plaintiff in an action instituted in the United States District Court and for the recovery by plaintiff of the costs, expenses and counsel fees incurred in the defense of the District Court action. The District Court case having been terminated in favor of the plaintiff herein the only relief now sought is for the recovery of the costs, expenses and counsel fees.
At the trial the following facts were either presented or stipulated to by the parties.
The plaintiff Ruben Dankoff was and is a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Zurich InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- John Wanamaker, New York, Inc. v. Otis Elevator Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Leven v. BirrellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1949
- Lockley v. RobieNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Spring v. MoncrieffNew York Supreme Court · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Belmer v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1993
- Mandell Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaNew York Supreme Court · 1984
- Tilden of New Jersey, Inc. v. Regency Leasing Systems, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997