Legal Opinion

Brooks v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 16, 1979No. [No. 4, September Term, 1978.]PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEldridge, J.

The issue in this case is whether the “required evidence test” or the “actual evidence test” is the general standard under Maryland law for determining whether one criminal offense merges into another.

The defendant Brooks was charged in the Circuit Court for Wicomico County with assault with intent to murder John Frank Williams, in violation of Maryland Code (1957, 1976 Repl. Vol.), Art. 27, § 12, and with carrying a deadly weapon openly with intent to injure Williams, in violation of Art. 27, § 36. At the defendant’s non-jury trial, the victim Williams testified that he, Catherine Anderson,…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Simpson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. State v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  2. Lewis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  3. Snowden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  4. State v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  5. Monoker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API