Monoker v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
COLE, Judge.
In this case we are presented with a new twist on the old concept of when two crimes merge, so as to uphold the mandate against double punishment for the “same offense.” More specifically, the issue of first impression is whether the crime of soliciting one to perform a criminal act should merge into the subsequent crime of conspiracy to commit that same act.
According to the agreed statement of facts, Petitioner, David Monoker, an attorney, was a friend of Charlotte Dubin and her husband. After the husband’s death in 1972, Monoker served as Mrs. Dubin’s attorney and accountant. In…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Illinois v. VitaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Simpson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Ladner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Newton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Lewis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- McMillian v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Snowden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- State v. LancasterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Gargliano v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.