Legal Opinion

State v. Waltz

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 7, 1888PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Muscatine District Qour-t. — Hon. W. P. Brannan, Judge. Defendant was indicted, for the offense of keeping a nuisance by maintaining a saloon for the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquors. A demurrer to the indictment was sustained, and defendant discharged. The state appeals. •

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

-I. The parts of the indictment necessary to be set out here are in the following language: “The grand jury of the county of Muscatine, in the name and by the authority of the state of Iowa, accuse P. J. Waltz of the crime of nuisance, committed as follows: The said P. J. Waltz, on the tenth day of November, A. D. 1886, in the county aforesaid, wilfully and unlawfully did use a certain building, known as a ‘saloon,’ for the purpose of selling therein, and therein did sell, intoxicating liquor of the kind prohibited by law, to-wit, whisky, brandy, rum, gin, ale, wine and beer, to divers…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. FreemanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1869
  2. State v. SchillingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1863
  3. State v. KreigSupreme Court of Iowa · 1862

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Donovan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  2. State v. ThoemkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  3. State v. SchulerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  4. State v. KruseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  5. State v. ShacklefordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API