Legal Opinion

State v. Kruse

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1909PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Ward County Court; N. Davis, J. George Kruse was convicted of maintaining a common nuisance, and he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCarmody, J.

The defendant was convicted in the county court of Ward county of the offense of keeping and maintaining a common nuisance during the two years immediately prior to February 17, 1908, in violation of the provisions of chapter 65 of the Penal Code (Rev. Codes 1905, sections 9353-9395), and appeals from the judgment of conviction and the order denying his motion for a new trial. Upon being arraigned he interposed a demurrer to the information upon the following grounds: (1) “That ,it does not substantially conform to the Code of North Dakota for the year 1905.” (2) “That more than one offense…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State v. RozumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
  2. State v. WisnewskiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
  3. State ex rel. Miller v. District CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  4. State v. StevensNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Frankel v. HillierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. KellyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  2. State v. WheelerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
  3. State v. WhiteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  4. State v. BurchamNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1920
  5. People v. ColomboCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API