Legal Opinion

State v. Schuler

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 4, 1899PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from "Howard District Court. — HoN A. N. Hobson, Judge. These cases present tbe same questions, and may be disposed of in a single opinion. Defendants are charged with keeping liquor nuisances. They each demurred to tbe indictments, and, upon tbe overruling of their demurrers, pleaded guilty to tbe offense charged. Thereafter they filed motions in arrest of judgment, which were overruled, and judgments were entered against them, from which they appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.

Tbe indictments ©acb contain two counts, one charging tbe defendant with keeping a building and erection or place in Howard county in which he sold, or kept with intent to sell, intoxicating liquors contrary to law, and the other with keeping a building or place in the village 1 lof Protivin, in Howard county, in which he sold, or kept with intent to' sell, intoxicating liquors contrary to law. There is no statement of ‘an intent to charge but a single offense. The demurrer was on the ground that the indictment charged two separate offenses, and that it was indefinite and uncertain as to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HaskinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  2. State v. CroganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
  3. State v. NewlandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1858
  4. State v. WaltzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  5. State v. HesnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. HochmuthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  2. State v. JaponeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  3. State v. GillilandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
  4. State v. ShacklefordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  5. State v. SnyderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API